analysis film politics president usa

The Decentralization of Political Power and Efficacy at the Cost of Integrity in the Presidency As…

I discuss media from 1964 to 2018. It’s a good one.

Powered by WPeMatico

community film life politics review

Let’s Holiday Early This Year

How About Christmas in July?

Powered by WPeMatico

film filmmaking life politics review

Myths And Meaning In Classic Cinema

An open invitation to join me in my screening room.

Powered by WPeMatico

fiction film leonardo-dicaprio romance titanic

“Titanic” is Cheesy

Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet star as Jack and Rose in Titanic (1997). (Photo: American Film Institute)

Since the pandemic started, I’ve been watching movies much more often than I used to. A few days ago, I finally got around to watching the famous Titanic.

Titanic was directed by James Cameron and came out in 1997. It stars Leonardo DiCaprio as Jack and Kate Winslet as Rose. The movie combines a historical tragedy with a fictional love story. It tells the story of Jack, a poor 20-year-old artist, and Rose, a wealthy but unfulfilled 17-year-old girl, as they travel on the doomed Titanic in 1912. Rose has been forced into an engagement to Cal, a snobbish rich young man whom she resents. Over the course of the film, Jack and Rose fall in love with each other and begin a passionate love affair, even while the villainous Cal tries to stop them. But then the ship hits the iceberg, and they are all in grave danger. In the end, Jack and Rose can only survive by floating on a wooden board. But the board is only big enough for one person, and Jack valiantly chooses to die so that Rose can live.

Titanic is one of the most celebrated and successful movies ever made. It broke the record for the highest-grossing film ever made, and it remains one of the top five most financially successful films of all time. It won a whopping eleven Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director, tying the record for most Oscars won by a single film.

The film also has a reputation for making people cry, because it is (supposedly) so beautiful and sad. And I had heard numerous references to the movie in pop culture long before I actually got around to watching it.

Given the film’s reputation, I was expecting that I would enjoy it. I didn’t expect it to be the greatest movie ever made, or anything like that, but I did expect that I would like it. But I didn’t. In fact, I couldn’t stand it. I found the movie to be so cringeworthy that I felt compelled to write this little blog post about it.

I disliked Titanic for two reasons: 1. I was annoyed by the fact that every character is either good or bad, with nothing in between, and 2. I don’t like the trope of the romantic young hero who sacrifices his life to save the love of his life (whom he met less than a week earlier, LOL).

Every character in Titanic is either good or bad, with nothing in between. Jack and Rose are the two main good guys, and Cal is the main bad guy. But it doesn’t stop there: even the minor characters are divided into good and bad. All of the rich characters except Rose and Molly are bad. Ruth is bad. Lovejoy is bad. Molly is good. All of Jack’s poor friends are good. Among the crew, Thomas Andrews is good, while J. Bruce Ismay is bad. Such subtlety.

In real life, of course, most people are somewhere in between good and bad. For example, if I look at my own life, am I a good guy or a bad guy? Well, I’m somewhere in between. I have done some things that were right and some things that were wrong. But after most of the bad things that I’ve done, I eventually realized that they were wrong, and I apologized for them, and I was forgiven. That’s the saving grace of life.

But in Titanic, there is no such saving grace. All the characters are either good or bad. The good characters do only good things, and the bad characters do only bad things.

In particular, I was bothered by how the character of Cal goes to such drastic lengths to get revenge on Jack, especially when he tries to murder Jack. But of course: Cal is the villain, so he has to do everything that a stereotypical villain does. Titanic is a very primitive movie, because its characters are so one-dimensional.

The character of Cal is nothing but a stereotypical villain. (Photo:

(By the way, it’s amazing how in movies, when the villain shoots the hero, the bullets always miraculously miss. I guess heroes are just so good that they grow force fields that deflect bullets.)

Titanic also involves a trope that I find irritating: the noble, romantic young hero who sacrifices his life to save his beautiful young love.

Titanic’s usage of this trope is all the more unrealistic, because Jack and Rose had only met each other four days earlier. After knowing her for only four days, Jack gladly welcomes death for Rose’s sake. That’s not even healthy.

The most cringeworthy line in the movie comes at the very end, when Jack is hanging on to the board, knowing that he will soon die but feeling nothing but ecstatic love for Rose. In his final moments, Jack declares, “Winning that ticket*, Rose, was the best thing that ever happened to me. It brought me to you, and I’m thankful for that, Rose, I’m thankful.” He goes on to beseech Rose to never give up in life and to be happy.

*(meaning, the ticket to board the Titanic, which Jack had won in a poker game)

Take a step back and think about what Jack said. He essentially said, “I welcome death, because I would rather die young and tragically than to have never met you.” That’s awful. That’s an awful sentiment. That would be like if a passenger on one of the airplanes on 9/11 declared, “Boarding this plane was the best thing that ever happened to me,” right before it crashed.

Jack considers his winning a ticket to board the Titanic to be the best thing that ever happened to him … even though it resulted in his own death. (Photo: 20th Century Fox)

No one should ever welcome a premature death, for any reason. In fact, it reminds me of an old quote: “The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of the mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one.” (I’m getting this quote from The Catcher in the Rye. I generally don’t like that book, but I do like that quote.)

If you are so madly in love that you would prefer a premature death over never having met, then that means you’re immature. A mature person might be willing to die for his lover if necessary, but he would not desire it.

In real life, people love each other as humans, not as noble heroes who sacrifice their lives. For example, consider my parents. My parents have been happily married for thirty years. They love each other. But neither of them has ever risked their life to save the other. Neither of them has ever slain a dragon on behalf of the other. Neither of them has ever had to fight off an evil villain in order to defend their love. And they don’t need to, because this is real life, not some corny movie. They love each other not as valiant, self-sacrificial heroes, but as real people. And that’s the way it should be.

In real life, you don’t have to sacrifice your life to save your love. You just have to accept them and love them for the flawed human being that they are, just as they accept and love you for the flawed human being that you are.

In conclusion, Titanic is a cheesy, melodramatic movie. All the characters are one-dimensional, and it presents an unrealistic portrayal of love, in which the hero welcomes death in order to save his love. That’s not how it works in the real world.

“Titanic” is Cheesy was originally published in ILLUMINATION on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Powered by WPeMatico

film humor movies poetry poetry-on-medium


You have been warned.

Powered by WPeMatico

business cinema film movies pandemic

I Work In The Cinema Industries, Here’s What To Expect Later

We are not going to lose to online streamings too.

Powered by WPeMatico

film filmmaking short-film student-film university

Simple Ways to Become a Better Student Filmmaker

The lessons I learnt from filmmaking at University

Needless to say, I am no filmmaking maestro. Mozart was hailed a genius at the age of three, however I am certainly not one despite completing three years’ Bachelor’s study in Film and History at university.

This is not to say however that my lasting student legacy consists entirely of endless microwave meals and a student bar tab Elon Musk would quiver at.

As my degree concentrated on theoretical study, in order to become involved on or to make my own films I had to scout for the opportunities to do so myself.

Through this endeavour I came to procure what I consider the most valuable pieces of advice for prospective student filmmakers to truly learn and excel, tips I can only wish I had been told before commencing my own filmmaking journey.

Think Small To Make Big

This is not intended to sound discouraging or prohibitive. Rather the contrary.

While attending university or film school you exist within a secure, localised bubble wherein you are privileged with being able to exploit every opportunity to be creative and make mistakes carefree, and so you should as there are realistically fewer opportunities to do so once you graduate and ‘real life’ sets in.

However, one classic blunder every amateur filmmaker should avoid committing is thinking beyond their means, something I am irrefutably guilty of.

In many ways it is more straightforward to produce a feature length film shooting across multiple locations and boasting a twenty-something cast than it is to create a one minute, no-budget short all shot on one location.

While every filmmaker strives to be the best they can be, while working at a lower tier you are presented with little choice other than to act as your own producer alongside anything else.

It is certainly not easy thinking both logistically and creatively, but this is a skill you are required to practice especially when you have little to no budget, your main setting is your university campus and your cast and crew are comprised of friends assisting you on the promise of beer and pizza.

However, once you recognise that restrictions breed innovation, you’ll be smiling! But avoid setting yourself impractical and unachievable goals, for this will only lead to disappointment and you harshly doubting your abilities as a filmmaker.

Someday you will possess the skills and funds to invest in making those bigger scripts, but for now there is no shame in storing these safely away in your filing cabinet until such a day comes. Bide your time and be patient!

No Shortcuts To Success

This may sound painfully obvious, but I can assure you that once you are fully immersed in the blissful chaos of shooting on a student filmset with countless variables all wreaking havoc on your sanity, appropriate onset protocol can swiftly exit the room.

Perhaps you have had a lead actor dropout of production the night before shooting, or maybe someone forgot to bring the spare SD cards and batteries to set (it happens).

Either way, such factors can cause you to stray to the dark side by encouraging you to cut corners. Doing so may alleviate certain stresses in the short term, but this will inevitably complicate your life later.

If you do not have a clapper board available, click your fingers at the bare minimum to mark a shot’s sync point.

If you are unsure about the continuity of an upcoming setup, devote the extra ten to fifteen minutes to consult your DP and examine the previous shoot’s dailies to resolve any concerns immediately. Ideally, on a student production everybody will be attuned to ensuring continuity is carried out correctly.

The caviller ‘we’ll fix it in post’ philosophy is a blatant myth. Postproduction is realistically only capable of enhancing and applying basic corrections, not of performing miracles on aspects that ought to have warranted greater consideration during production.

Learn and respect the rules before you ever consider breaking them.

‘ If a job’s worth doing, it’s worth doing well ’ — Leni Riefenstahl

Be Openminded And Collaborate

Something every film student is quickly exposed to is the sheer diversity of different characters they will encounter throughout the course of their studies.

Every student can readily conjure a mental image of that one classmate who legitimately believes they are the protégé of Jean-Luc Godard. But while they stand there sounding off all the pretentious reasons why you should be shooting on 16mm, you know better than to get sucked into their delusions.

The fact is, none of this really matters. Ultimately, filmmaking is not a solo venture and so all creatives should openly embrace working with all types of people from various backgrounds, views and levels of experience.

University is irrefutably the perfect environment to accomplish this level of collaboration.

As a student you are able to connect with people whom you may otherwise never have interacted with and this can lead to hugely enjoyable and rewarding experiences. Furthermore, you will have forged friendships that will inevitably prove beneficial for you in the future.

Still from Life of the Party by Miroslav Films

Learn Through Practice

Recalling the analogy of university representing a safe, close-knit setting for artistic cultivation, another positive about this is that you can expand beyond your own specialism by experimenting with other roles involved in the production process.

Learn to record sound; explore the many nuances of being a clapper loader; learn to edit; study the techniques that different lights are capable of and while you’re at it, discover why we don’t use redhead lamps for extended periods of time.

(Think of being trapped in an elevator if the elevator in question was situated on the sun).

Learning through practice in this way will mould you into a more skilled and versatile filmmaker, as well as being an invaluable asset on other peoples’ productions and your own.

Watch Short Films

Unless you are one of the lucky individuals whose ‘dying great-aunt’ clogging up their email junk box legitimately turns out to be a millionaire, the likelihood is that you will only be able to finance short films for the foreseeable future.

So it only makes sense then that you ought to be watching short films as well, right?

By actively viewing as many short films as you can, you will gradually develop your visual literacy.

Through closely observing how the various elements that constitute a film collaborate together to form the finished product, overtime you will learn how to incorporate these techniques to inform and develop your own storytelling.

YouTube is an obvious source of creative output. One channel in particular called Omeleto showcases an abundance of high quality and award-winning short films, originating from various skillsets.

Also readily available to view are the professional filmmaker roundtables hosted by The Hollywood Reporter, interviews with actors and creatives online, as well as the bonus features and BTS content available on DVDs.

All of these things collectively form their own kind of film school, one which you won’t have to contribute a further £15,000 towards.

Another avenue worth researching is whether your favourite professional filmmakers have ever produced a short film during their early careers. One of my popular choices is The Big Shave (1967), Martin Scorsese’s five minute short film debut he made while attending New York University.

Still from The Big Shave by Demasiado Cine!

TBS is a captivating and subliminal piece that essentially begins as a Gillette advert and ends by resembling the infamous prom scene from Carrie (1976). For the purposes of this article, it is especially relevant.

The entire narrative unfolds within one confined setting (a neon-white bathroom), shooting on a low budget and stars just one actor (Peter Bernuth) who plays the nameless protagonist.

Despite featuring close to eighty cuts, TBS probably contains half as many shots, of which are primarily formed of inserts and cutaways. With this in mind, Scorsese echoes our first heading.

He demonstrates that it’s possible to take the even most simple premise, in this case a mundane everyday act, and transform it into a memorable and meaningful spectacle that continues to unanimously intrigue filmmakers and encourage amateur recreations.

All of this was accomplished by Scorsese not feeling tempted or pressured into relying on larger narrative structures laden with witty dialogue and immense production value, alternatively giving weight to the phrase: ‘you can do a lot with a little’.

Make A Film

Something a 1st AD once remarked on a short course I attended that has resonated with me ever since, was that highly competitive roles in the film industry such as directing should not be perceived as a job, but as a craft akin to any other form of artistry.

Basically, what he was saying is that investing years of energy into working as a runner, then a 3rd AD, then a second AD and so on, does not automatically guarantee you will become a director.

The point he was alluding to is probably the single most valuable advice any filmmaker can offer, which is to go and shoot something. If you want to write, write. If you want to direct, pick up a camera and shoot something.

Continuously work on building your portfolio and perfecting your craft, even if you are convinced that what you’re making is awful and you cannot help repulsing at the mere sight of it forever afterwards.

It’s perfectly natural to be self-critical and to doubt your abilities in this way. You’d be mad or foolish if you didn’t. But the one thing no filmmaker should do is be ashamed of their early work.

We all have to start somewhere, even Martin Scorsese. Although this sounds like a cliché it is also extremely easy to neglect when you’re a beginner struggling to break into what is definitely a very intimidating industry.

There is no rush to be successful and you most certainly won’t make your masterpiece at university.

But if you are focused and the healthy kind of crazy, you will continue learning from your mistakes and trying and failing until you eventually do so.

My first time on a student filmset (back when I still thought burgundy chinos were something to behold). Photo by Wessex Films

Simple Ways to Become a Better Student Filmmaker was originally published in ILLUMINATION on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Powered by WPeMatico

cinema entertainment facts film movies

15 Random Movie Facts You Need To Know

15 Random Movies Facts

Powered by WPeMatico

film human-behavior movie-review movies opinion

Parasite: The Movie

A Few Random Thoughts

Powered by WPeMatico

culture film love personal-development relationships

The Brilliance of ‘Your Name’

An analysis of Makoto Shinkai’s ode to love

Powered by WPeMatico